.svg){kind=small}
Looking for which Email provider will be the best for your use case among
Bandwidth
vs
Ring Central
vs
Plivo
?
Compare
Bandwidth
vs
Ring Central
vs
Plivo
head-to-head on factors such as their
features, pricing, latency, deliverability and more.
Introducing
Bandwidth
vs
Ring Central
vs
Plivo
,
two industry leading Email vendors that are transforming the way businesses connect with their audience
The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.
A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!
Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.
The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.
A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!
Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.
In a market flooded with Email providers, selecting the one that suits your needs can be challenging. This comparative guide offers a swift overview of their offerings, making it easy for you to decide.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Not Supported
Not Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Not Supported
Not Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Every choice comes with its trade-offs. Let's break down the advantages and disadvantages of the providers for a clear decision making.
Users appreciate Bandwidth's quick response times and the understanding nature of their representatives, especially when it comes to setting up calls and making changes.
Users find it beneficial that they can make changes on the fly without needing an ITSP team, thanks to Bandwidth's user-friendly portal.
Users highlight Bandwidth's reliability in services like numbering API, porting, and emergency services, making their jobs easier.
Bandwidth is praised for its worldwide coverage and the ability to manage legal and regulatory requirements for different countries.
Users like the self-service options available through Bandwidth's portal, which makes managing telecom services more efficient.
Some users find Bandwidth's pricing to be less competitive for mid-sized companies, especially concerning international rates.
Users mention the lack of real-time usage and billing tracking, which can be inconvenient.
Exporting data from Bandwidth's system is noted to be slow at times.
Users find it challenging to navigate Bandwidth's system when managing number requirements by country.
Some users mention quirks in Bandwidth's dashboard, such as limitations and difficulties in adding CNAM to numbers upon port order entry.
Users appreciate Bandwidth's quick response times and the understanding nature of their representatives, especially when it comes to setting up calls and making changes.
Users find it beneficial that they can make changes on the fly without needing an ITSP team, thanks to Bandwidth's user-friendly portal.
Users highlight Bandwidth's reliability in services like numbering API, porting, and emergency services, making their jobs easier.
Bandwidth is praised for its worldwide coverage and the ability to manage legal and regulatory requirements for different countries.
Users like the self-service options available through Bandwidth's portal, which makes managing telecom services more efficient.
Some users reported frequent system outages or downtime, which disrupted their business operations.
While customer service representatives were often friendly, there were complaints about the amount of time spent on the phone with them to resolve issues.
Users mentioned that complex configurations could lead to accidental changes in settings, causing problems with call routing and transfers.
The cost of RingCentral MVP, particularly for text messaging plans, was a concern for some users, especially for small businesses.
Some solopreneurs felt limited by the requirement to have two lines to access certain features, impacting their overall cost.
Plivo offers a robust and easy-to-use API for Voice and SMS communication. This makes it a good choice for developers who want to integrate communication features into their applications.
Plivo offers flexible BYOC (Bring Your Own Carrier) options, which allows businesses to use their own carriers for voice and SMS traffic. This can save businesses money on their communication costs.
Plivo supports a diverse range of local numbers, which makes it a good choice for businesses that want to reach customers in multiple countries.
Plivo offers competitive pricing for its services. This makes it a good choice for businesses on a budget.
Plivo's user interface is easy to use and navigate. This makes it a good choice for businesses of all sizes.
Some users have reported that Plivo's customer support is not as responsive or helpful as they would like.
Plivo may not offer as many advanced features as some of its competitors. This could limit its appeal for certain use cases.
Plivo has been the victim of several security breaches in recent years. This has raised concerns about the security of its platform.
Users appreciate Bandwidth's quick response times and the understanding nature of their representatives, especially when it comes to setting up calls and making changes.
Users find it beneficial that they can make changes on the fly without needing an ITSP team, thanks to Bandwidth's user-friendly portal.
Users highlight Bandwidth's reliability in services like numbering API, porting, and emergency services, making their jobs easier.
Bandwidth is praised for its worldwide coverage and the ability to manage legal and regulatory requirements for different countries.
Users like the self-service options available through Bandwidth's portal, which makes managing telecom services more efficient.
Some users find Bandwidth's pricing to be less competitive for mid-sized companies, especially concerning international rates.
Users mention the lack of real-time usage and billing tracking, which can be inconvenient.
Exporting data from Bandwidth's system is noted to be slow at times.
Users find it challenging to navigate Bandwidth's system when managing number requirements by country.
Some users mention quirks in Bandwidth's dashboard, such as limitations and difficulties in adding CNAM to numbers upon port order entry.
RingCentral MVP offers a wide range of communication options, including messaging, video, and phone calls, making it easy for users to connect with others.
Users appreciate the ability to customize the system, such as choosing hold music and call handling options, allowing for a personalized experience.
RingCentral MVP provides features for call tracking, making it easy to monitor and record calls, which can be beneficial for businesses.
Many users find the platform easy to navigate and user-friendly, even for complex tasks like setting up call routing.
Users like having all their messages, including SMS, in one place, simplifying communication management.
Some users reported frequent system outages or downtime, which disrupted their business operations.
While customer service representatives were often friendly, there were complaints about the amount of time spent on the phone with them to resolve issues.
Users mentioned that complex configurations could lead to accidental changes in settings, causing problems with call routing and transfers.
The cost of RingCentral MVP, particularly for text messaging plans, was a concern for some users, especially for small businesses.
Some solopreneurs felt limited by the requirement to have two lines to access certain features, impacting their overall cost.
Plivo offers a robust and easy-to-use API for Voice and SMS communication. This makes it a good choice for developers who want to integrate communication features into their applications.
Plivo offers flexible BYOC (Bring Your Own Carrier) options, which allows businesses to use their own carriers for voice and SMS traffic. This can save businesses money on their communication costs.
Plivo supports a diverse range of local numbers, which makes it a good choice for businesses that want to reach customers in multiple countries.
Plivo offers competitive pricing for its services. This makes it a good choice for businesses on a budget.
Plivo's user interface is easy to use and navigate. This makes it a good choice for businesses of all sizes.
Some users have reported that Plivo's customer support is not as responsive or helpful as they would like.
Plivo may not offer as many advanced features as some of its competitors. This could limit its appeal for certain use cases.
Plivo has been the victim of several security breaches in recent years. This has raised concerns about the security of its platform.
Don't just take our word for it. Hear directly from users on G2 who have used
Bandwidth
,
Ring Central
and
Plivo
firsthand
The main problem we are solving is bringing external calling capabilities to MS Teams users through a more manageable and cost-effective means than going the MS dial plan route. Microsoft has, however, made improvements to its dial plans that have lessened some of the advantages with phone number management and routing.
Enterprise User
The GUI is extremely user-friendly! Processing new requests and looking up existing ones is quick and simple. The notification feature saves you time without manually checking back for updates. The only item that would be helpful and a time saver would be the ability to process CNAM requests for Canadian numbers the same way as local US numbers.
Enterprise User
The features in here are fantastic! Messaging, video, and phone, including SMS. You can easily navigate to find what you need, see all of your messages in one place. The only thing I would change, is the ability to monitor callers participation in a visual aspect.
Sales Manager
One of the key strengths of RingCentral MVP is its user-friendly interface, which makes it easy for employees to navigate and utilize its various features. Whether it's initiating video meetings, sending instant messages, or managing voicemail, the platform offers a streamlined experience that enhances productivity and collaboration.
Small Business
Plivo is a pretty easy platform to understand, especially with a background of working at a SaaS company. Plivo is our chosen SMS provider for our advocate/supporter activation texts - I haven't had any need to reach out to support, though, so I can't comment on their customer service level. Similarly to most SaaS softwares, there are SO many ways to do the same thing.
SaaS Customer Success Enablement
I like the simplicity. Plivo has a lot of docs, integration libraries and ways to use in business and life scenarios. And this makes it awesome tool for everyday tasks (like call forwarding) and for real business cases (like complex ivrs and so on). It not related to Plivo, but sometimes there are issues with sms A numbers, ability to change call A numbers, but it's all about call providers, and service cannot be responsible for that.
Software Engineer
Compare top SMS providers in 2024 in US – Exotel V/S Gupshup V/S MessageBird. Find out which SMS provider is right for your needs based on their features, latency, cost per message, geographic reach, compliance, and more.
Compare top SMS providers in 2024 in US – Exotel V/S Gupshup V/S Karix. Find out which SMS provider is right for your needs based on their features, latency, cost per message, geographic reach, compliance, and more.
Compare top SMS providers in 2024 in US – Sinch V/S MessageBird V/S Karix. Find out which SMS provider is right for your needs based on their features, latency, cost per message, geographic reach, compliance, and more.
